The preacher of hate that Obama followed for 20 years was the foundation of Obama's powerbase
A Okie look at all thing Politics, eCampaign, New Media and Warfare - - - I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. - John Adams
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Monday, September 22, 2008
Jackie Mason '08 Vlog 54 Obama and the Economy
The Obama campaign and the rest of the Democrats have a lot chutzpah to blame this economic crisis on the Republicans. Obama stated in a speech that John McCain blamed him for this mess. If Obama didn't cause this mess he sure did benefit from it and now he's attacking McCain for it? His campaign is a "Who's Who" of people from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Not to mention the amount of money he received for his campaign that came directly from those companies. Obama says that McCain, by his own admission, doesn't know much about the economy. At least McCain is honest enough to admit it. No one is bringing up the critical question of how much Obama knows about the economy, which is bupkis. The only thing he knows about the economy is how to exploit the corruption to fund his campaign.
Labels:
Bail Out,
Brack Obama,
Bubble,
Crisis Housing,
Economy,
election,
Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac,
Jackie Mason,
John McCain,
Politics,
USA
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
to the woodshed, rinos!
Hat Tip to my buddy Beth @ 'my vast right wing conspiracy'

Posted by Beth on January 23rd, 2008
Excuse me while I join the Anchoress in escorting Reaganites In Name Only (oops! I mean angry conservatives! or did I?) to the woodshed. I’ll be the one holding a whip, just itching to use it.
Attention, fellow former Fredheads–you who say you’re a Reagan conservative, but refuse to learn the art of politics and teamwork in the pursuit of achieving big-picture common goals: If you plan on sitting out the elections, or, God forbid, voting Democrat to “teach a lesson” or whatever, you are not a Reagan conservative. You are not a real Fredhead, either. Neither of these men would do such a thing.
Don’t believe me? Don’t just take my word for it, although I know this to be an absolute truth–here’s another thing the Anchoress mentions:
Oh, how soon those dragging around Reagan’s corpse forget.
I find it literally jaw-dropping when I read someone invoking the name of Ronald Reagan, while in the same sentence (!) petulantly announcing that none of the candidates are conservative enough and that voting this year is simply not an option. Or even more amusingly, announcing that Candidate X has “betrayed” conservatives or “stabbed us in the back,” while betraying conservatism themselves. Huh??? Epic FAIL.
I’ll allow the Anchoress to finish. (Read the comments, too.) God bless her for saving me from a head explosion.
And thank you, Wuzzadem, for making me laugh as you always do. After the last couple of days, I needed it. :)

Posted by Beth on January 23rd, 2008
Excuse me while I join the Anchoress in escorting Reaganites In Name Only (oops! I mean angry conservatives! or did I?) to the woodshed. I’ll be the one holding a whip, just itching to use it.
It seems the standard GOP voter - and apparently Rush Limbaugh - wants to disinter Ronald Reagan from his noble tomb and hoist him onto the campaign trail because he is their saint and savior, and if they can’t vote for someone exactly like him “Ronaldus Magnus” well, they’re going to sit out this all-important election.
Excuse me, but Ronald Reagan would have had no patience for the likes of you.
Attention, fellow former Fredheads–you who say you’re a Reagan conservative, but refuse to learn the art of politics and teamwork in the pursuit of achieving big-picture common goals: If you plan on sitting out the elections, or, God forbid, voting Democrat to “teach a lesson” or whatever, you are not a Reagan conservative. You are not a real Fredhead, either. Neither of these men would do such a thing.
Don’t believe me? Don’t just take my word for it, although I know this to be an absolute truth–here’s another thing the Anchoress mentions:
Ronald Reagan above all was a pragmatist and a realist. He understood something that some voters seem to have forgotten:
“When I began entering into the give and take of legislative bargaining in Sacramento, a lot of the most radical conservatives who had supported me during the election didn’t like it. “Compromise” was a dirty word to them and they wouldn’t face the fact that we couldn’t get all of what we wanted today. They wanted all or nothing and they wanted it all at once. If you don’t get it all, some said, don’t take anything. I’d learned while negotiating union contracts that you seldom got everything you asked for. And I agreed with FDR, who said in 1933: ‘I have no expectations of making a hit every time I come to bat. What I seek is the highest possible batting average.’ If you got seventy-five or eighty percent of what you were asking for, I say, you take it and fight for the rest later, and that’s what I told these radical conservatives who never got used to it.“
– Ronald Reagan, An American Life
Oh, how soon those dragging around Reagan’s corpse forget.
I find it literally jaw-dropping when I read someone invoking the name of Ronald Reagan, while in the same sentence (!) petulantly announcing that none of the candidates are conservative enough and that voting this year is simply not an option. Or even more amusingly, announcing that Candidate X has “betrayed” conservatives or “stabbed us in the back,” while betraying conservatism themselves. Huh??? Epic FAIL.
I’ll allow the Anchoress to finish. (Read the comments, too.) God bless her for saving me from a head explosion.
And thank you, Wuzzadem, for making me laugh as you always do. After the last couple of days, I needed it. :)
Labels:
2008 election,
Candidates,
FDT,
Fred Thompson,
FredHead,
General,
Politics,
Republicans
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Flip Flop Mitt
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)