Bobby Jindal talk about the Stimulus bill

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal talk about the Stimulus bill on Meet the Press.

"The $100 million we turned down was temporary federal dollars that would require us to change our unemployment laws. That would’ve actually raised taxes on Louisiana businesses. We as a state would’ve been responsible for paying for those benefits after the federal money disappeared."

"That’s great, except the federal law, if you actually read the bill -- and I know it was 1,000 pages, and I know they got it, you know, at midnight, or hours before they voted on it -- if you actually read the bill, there’s one problem with that.

The word “permanent” is in the bill. It requires the state to make a permanent change in our law. Law B -- our employer group agrees with me.

They say, “Yes, this will result an increase in taxes on our businesses, this will result in a permanent obligation on the state of Louisiana.” It would be like spending $1 to get a dime.

Why would we take temporary federal dollars if we’re going to end up having a permanent program?

And here’s the problem. So many of these things that are called temporary programs end up being permanent government programs. But this one’s crystal clear, black and white, letter of the law. The federal stimulus bill says it has to be a permanent change in state law if you take this state money.

And so, within three years, the federal money’s gone, we’ve got now a permanent change in our laws, we have to pay for it, our businesses pay for it. I don’t think it makes sense to be raising taxes on Louisiana businesses during these economically challenging times.

And what it shows is what we’re going to do in the stimulus is we’re going to look at every program, every dollar. If it makes sense for Louisiana, makes sense for our taxpayers, we’ll use those programs and dollars. If it doesn’t -- like, on Friday, we said, “This doesn’t make sense for us. This is not a good deal for us.”

It makes -- my job is to represent Louisiana’s taxpayers. Makes no sense for us to take temporary federal dollars and create permanent state obligations."