Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts

Sunday, August 16, 2009

The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare




OPINION
AUGUST 12, 2009
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A15

The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare

By JOHN MACKEY

“The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people’s money.”

—Margaret Thatcher

With a projected $1.8 trillion deficit for 2009, several trillions more in deficits projected over the next decade, and with both Medicare and Social Security entitlement spending about to ratchet up several notches over the next 15 years as Baby Boomers become eligible for both, we are rapidly running out of other people’s money. These deficits are simply not sustainable. They are either going to result in unprecedented new taxes and inflation, or they will bankrupt us.

While we clearly need health-care reform, the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction—toward less government control and more individual empowerment. Here are eight reforms that would greatly lower the cost of health care for everyone:

• Remove the legal obstacles that slow the creation of high-deductible health insurance plans and health savings accounts (HSAs). The combination of high-deductible health insurance and HSAs is one solution that could solve many of our health-care problems. For example, Whole Foods Market pays 100% of the premiums for all our team members who work 30 hours or more per week (about 89% of all team members) for our high-deductible health-insurance plan. We also provide up to $1,800 per year in additional health-care dollars through deposits into employees’ Personal Wellness Accounts to spend as they choose on their own health and wellness.

Money not spent in one year rolls over to the next and grows over time. Our team members therefore spend their own health-care dollars until the annual deductible is covered (about $2,500) and the insurance plan kicks in. This creates incentives to spend the first $2,500 more carefully. Our plan’s costs are much lower than typical health insurance, while providing a very high degree of worker satisfaction.

• Equalize the tax laws so that that employer-provided health insurance and individually owned health insurance have the same tax benefits. Now employer health insurance benefits are fully tax deductible, but individual health insurance is not. This is unfair.

• Repeal all state laws which prevent insurance companies from competing across state lines. We should all have the legal right to purchase health insurance from any insurance company in any state and we should be able use that insurance wherever we live. Health insurance should be portable.

• Repeal government mandates regarding what insurance companies must cover. These mandates have increased the cost of health insurance by billions of dollars. What is insured and what is not insured should be determined by individual customer preferences and not through special-interest lobbying.

• Enact tort reform to end the ruinous lawsuits that force doctors to pay insurance costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. These costs are passed back to us through much higher prices for health care.

• Make costs transparent so that consumers understand what health-care treatments cost. How many people know the total cost of their last doctor’s visit and how that total breaks down? What other goods or services do we buy without knowing how much they will cost us?

• Enact Medicare reform. We need to face up to the actuarial fact that Medicare is heading towards bankruptcy and enact reforms that create greater patient empowerment, choice and responsibility.

• Finally, revise tax forms to make it easier for individuals to make a voluntary, tax-deductible donation to help the millions of people who have no insurance and aren’t covered by Medicare, Medicaid or the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

Many promoters of health-care reform believe that people have an intrinsic ethical right to health care—to equal access to doctors, medicines and hospitals. While all of us empathize with those who are sick, how can we say that all people have more of an intrinsic right to health care than they have to food or shelter?

Health care is a service that we all need, but just like food and shelter it is best provided through voluntary and mutually beneficial market exchanges. A careful reading of both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution will not reveal any intrinsic right to health care, food or shelter. That’s because there isn’t any. This “right” has never existed in America

Even in countries like Canada and the U.K., there is no intrinsic right to health care. Rather, citizens in these countries are told by government bureaucrats what health-care treatments they are eligible to receive and when they can receive them. All countries with socialized medicine ration health care by forcing their citizens to wait in lines to receive scarce treatments.

Although Canada has a population smaller than California, 830,000 Canadians are currently waiting to be admitted to a hospital or to get treatment, according to a report last month in Investor’s Business Daily. In England, the waiting list is 1.8 million.

At Whole Foods we allow our team members to vote on what benefits they most want the company to fund. Our Canadian and British employees express their benefit preferences very clearly—they want supplemental health-care dollars that they can control and spend themselves without permission from their governments. Why would they want such additional health-care benefit dollars if they already have an “intrinsic right to health care”? The answer is clear—no such right truly exists in either Canada or the U.K.—or in any other country.

Rather than increase government spending and control, we need to address the root causes of poor health. This begins with the realization that every American adult is responsible for his or her own health.

Unfortunately many of our health-care problems are self-inflicted: two-thirds of Americans are now overweight and one-third are obese. Most of the diseases that kill us and account for about 70% of all health-care spending—heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes and obesity—are mostly preventable through proper diet, exercise, not smoking, minimal alcohol consumption and other healthy lifestyle choices.

Recent scientific and medical evidence shows that a diet consisting of foods that are plant-based, nutrient dense and low-fat will help prevent and often reverse most degenerative diseases that kill us and are expensive to treat. We should be able to live largely disease-free lives until we are well into our 90s and even past 100 years of age.

Health-care reform is very important. Whatever reforms are enacted it is essential that they be financially responsible, and that we have the freedom to choose doctors and the health-care services that best suit our own unique set of lifestyle choices. We are all responsible for our own lives and our own health. We should take that responsibility very seriously and use our freedom to make wise lifestyle choices that will protect our health. Doing so will enrich our lives and will help create a vibrant and sustainable American society.

—Mr. Mackey is co-founder and CEO of Whole Foods Market Inc.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

"The Oklahoma 3" Rally with Paul Jacob, Sen. Randy Brogdon



The Oklahoma 3, does not deserve to be the target of political retaliation from politicians who want to limit the political choices available to all Oklahomans.

This is an issue that transcends the political spectrum. Every one of us has a dog in this race." All of us may, in good time and for pressing issues, decide in the future to exercise our right to petition for redress of grievance via the initiative petition process. Any limitation on that right is therefore a direct attack on all of us.




Hat Tip to my Buddy Jenn @ forthardknox.com

Paul Jacob Kicks off the
“Save the Initiative Blog Tour”
by Jenn Sierra
January 28, 2008 at 10:20 pm

Today I had the pleasure of speaking with Paul Jacob after the arraignment of
"the Oklahoma 3" (Paul Jacob, Susan Johnson, and Rick Carpenter). One might think that with the prospect of about a year ahead of him in legal battles, he might want to just relax and take a break, but quite the opposite was true. He stated the arraignment had gone about as expected, and that he would, if needed be back for the scheduling hearing on March 13th.

But then he was ready to talk about several Oklahoma initiatives, about the initiative process in general, and about his new project over the next year - which is is calling the “Save the Initiative Blog Tour.” The goal, partially, is to make bloggers more aware of the importance of the initiative process.

Jacob stated that his three major goals regarding his legal process are:

1) Win in Court

2) Get the residency laws in the states that have them “thrown out.”

3) Make sure this indictment of the Oklahoma 3 does not become a deterrent to intiative-activists, but that it instead becomes a rallying cry for them.


Jacob explained that the initiative process does for politics what the first amendment did for the media, and that a successful revolution of this process would allow citizens to dynamically address te legal system - now and in the future.

He shared that for a citizen, deciding to begin an initiative (e.g. for term limits, spending limits, government accountability, etc..) requires that citizen to count the cost, personally, and those costs can be astromical, personally and professionally. There is an enormous amount of time (away from family, career, personal life), and often a huge financial burden involved. But when the additional cost of legal retaliation by the government becomes a consideration, many citizens decide they simply cannot take that risk, and will “shut up.” Jacob’s goal, in working through his own legal battle, through his foundation (Citizens in Charge), through the Sam Adams Alliance and Foundation, and now through the “Save the Initiative Blog Tour” is to reduce the fear of such legal action against citizens by their government.

When asked what advice he would give to citizens who are considering becoming involved in the initiative process, he said:

1) Go for it.

2) Get an attorney. It may seem ridiculous to need an attorney to petition your own government, and it is, but get an attorney.

3) Look “over your shoulder” on every move. Retaliation from certain government officials can extend to the initiative creators, the petitioners, the volunteers, and even the donors.

4) If a move is questionable, go the “unquestionable route.”

5) Remember that if you can just succeed in getting the initiative on the ballot, you can still win (even if you’re outspent and bullied by the opposition).

6) Don’t give up. If we give up our right to petition our own government, we aren’t going to like what our country looks like for our children and grandchildren.

Finally, when asked how bloggers, and our blog readers can help - both with the legal battle of the Oklahoma 3, and with the citizen initiative process in general - Paul said:

1) Spread the word, by talking with your neighbors

2) Contact the governor (in this case of Oklahoma, Brad Henry)

3) Don’t “harrass” Drew Edmondson or his staff, simply for the sake of harrassing them.

4)Pay attention to current legislative measures pending, and contact your legislators.

The most inspiring thing that Paul said to me during the interview was that he considered the sacrifices he is making now to be insurance for his children’s and grandchildren’s future. Although he made it clear that he fully intends to win this case, he also stated that it was even more important that the end-result of his efforts was an America in which citizens are free to petition their government, and carry out the initiative process. If this meant he had to go to jail, then he would be willing to do it.

For more information, see Free Paul Jacob.

For more info see

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

In Oklahoma, freedom's not OK




In Oklahoma,
freedom's not OK


Our view

For most people, the right to petition the government is as old as our Bill of Rights. Others may argue the right extends to the Declaration of Independence or to ancient English documents.

Comes now the state of Oklahoma, in the person of Attorney General Drew Edmondson, with different ideas.

Edmondson has indicted three people — Paul Jacob, former head of U.S. Term Limits; Rick Carpenter of Oklahomans in Action; and Susan Johnson of National Voter Outreach — for what he says is willful violation of state law prohibiting out-of-state people to circulate political petitions in Oklahoma. The defendants and their supporters say the real impetus behind this prosecution by Edmondson, a Democrat, is the indicted trio's successful petition campaign against big government.

Some background: Carpenter, a Tulsan, launched the petition effort in 2005 when he sought to limit government spending there. Despite overt efforts by opposing organizations to defeat the petition drive, some 300,000 Oklahomans signed on, enough to put the question on the ballot. That's when the state Supreme Court weighed in.

The high court ruled state law prohibited out-of-state people like Jacob and Johnson, professional organizers, and out-of-staters like some of those who distributed petitions, from operating in Oklahoma. Out-of-state people who would — and did — try to block petition drives are permitted, not those who distribute them.

The petition organizers had sought legal clearance before they launched their First Amendment work. They were told they could operate with only the intent to move to Oklahoma. But in its ruling, the high court changed the rules, petition organizers charge, by saying out-of-staters must intend "permanent residence" in Oklahoma. It gets worse.

Edmondson pursued felony criminal charges against the Oklahoma Three. When his October 2007 indictment of the petition organizers encountered legal problems, Edmonson indicted the three again. Jacob, Carpenter and Johnson — who have been handcuffed and shackled in Oklahoma, and threatened with 10 years in the slammer — are scheduled for arraignment at month's end.

If you thought Oklahoma was a conservative state, guess again. With Edmondson — critics call him the ayatollah of Oklahoma — operating, nobody's freedom is safe. If one group of petitioners can be prosecuted on political whim, eventually all petitioners can face some form of prosecutor abuse.

Oklahoma's continuing drama demonstrates America's most vicious and divisive political trend in the last two decades: the criminalization of political differences.

In Jena, thousands gathered in 2007 to decry what they believed was unjust court action, siding with six people — the Jena Six — who were accused in the savage attack of one schoolmate. The Oklahoma Three is accused of no savagery; these three law-abiding people merely petitioned the state government. How many will show up at 1:30 p.m. Jan. 28 at the Oklahoma County Courthouse, 321 Park Ave., Oklahoma City — that's when and where their arraignment is scheduled — to protest the state of Oklahoma's political savagery?

You don't need to be a permanent Oklahoma citizen to do that. Not yet.

Given the political climate, who'd want to be?

thenewsstar.com

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Petitioner indictments short democratic rights

THE PEOPLE SPEAK:
Petitioner indictments
short democratic rights


As independent voters, we are concerned that the initiative and referendum process in Oklahoma is being threatened.

Three initiative leaders were brought up on criminal charges by the attorney general (Drew Edmondson) for hiring out-of-state petition carriers to help place an initiative on the ballot after they had been assured that it was legal. More than 300,000 Oklahomans signed the petition. However, the court ultimately ruled the initiative off the ballot, and it was never voted on.

Now almost a year later, the attorney general has indicted the three initiative leaders for “willfully violating” the state’s residency requirements.

His persecution of the initiative leaders is a blow to the democratic rights of Oklahoma citizens. It serves only to frighten and intimidate voters from exercising their constitutional rights to participate in the initiative process.

We urge you to call on the attorney general to drop this indictment and to defend our right to initiative and petition.

John Adair of Edmond and 46 other Oklahomans


Editor’s note: The above letter was sent to Gov. Brad Henry this month from a group called Oklahoma Independent Voters, Kim Wright of Altus, chair.

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Paul Jacob updates the case against the "Oklahoma 3"


Paul Jacob, citizen leader and Senior Advisor with the Sam Adams Foundation, discusses what's happened since his criminal indictment in October 2007. OK Attorney General Drew Edmondson accuses Paul and two others of breaking a state law regarding petition signature gathering, but Paul and the others followed the law as it had been interpreted previously by the OK Supreme Court. Now Edmondson wants to imprison the OK 3 for up to 10 years. For more information, visit http://www.freepauljacob.com and http://www.samadamsalliance.org

For the background on the Oklahoma 3 see this...



A mash-up video, about the Oklahoma AG's attack on "The Oklahoma 3".

The Oklahoma 3, does not deserve to be the target of political retaliation from politicians who want to limit the political choices available to all Oklahomans.

This is an issue that transcends the political spectrum. Every one of us has a dog in this race." All of us may, in good time and for pressing issues, decide in the future to exercise our right to petition for redress of grievance via the initiative petition process. Any limitation on that right is therefore a direct attack on all of us.

Friday, December 7, 2007

FLASH - DREW’s CRUSADE Part 2: The RE-Indictment of “The Oklahoma 3”

It look like our AG has re-file "CRIMINAL FELONY" counts on "The Oklahoma 3"

“Everyone should be deeply concerned about this,” Oklahoma Sen. Randy Brogdon said.
“The Constitutional rights of every citizen of Oklahoma are in jeopardy as well as the
liberty of three good people who face ten years in prison. If this shameful political
assault succeeds, everyone is at risk. It is an outrage!”

Brogdon said the only crime committed was the disenfranchisement of over
300,000 Oklahoma voters who expressed their voice by exercising their
Constitutional rights.


"The Oklahoma 3" are Rick Carpenter, Susan Johnson and Paul Jacob

Also for more Info see

www.freepauljacob.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS42UfTfQd0

http://tinyurl.com/2vkn9x



more to come....

Thursday, December 6, 2007

DREW’s CRUSADE: The Indictment of “The Oklahoma 3”




A mash-up video, about the Oklahoma AG’s attack on "The Oklahoma 3".

The Oklahoma 3, does not deserve to be the target of political retaliation from corrupt politicians who want to limit the political choices available to all Oklahomans.

This is an issue that transcends the political spectrum. Every one of us has a dog in this race.” All of us may, in good time and for pressing issues, decide in the future to exercise our right to petition for redress of grievance via the initiative petition process. Any limitation on that right is therefore a direct attack on all of us.

“Everyone should be deeply concerned about this,” Oklahoma Sen. Randy Brogdon said. “The Constitutional rights of every citizen of Oklahoma are in jeopardy as well as the liberty of three good people who face ten years in prison. If this shameful political assault succeeds, everyone is at risk. It is an outrage!”
Brogdon said the only crime committed was the disenfranchisement of over 300,000 Oklahoma voters who expressed their voice by exercising their Constitutional rights.

“It appears Drew Edmondson is more concerned with protecting his own political power than he is with preserving, protecting, and defending the right of Oklahomans to free speech,” Brogdon added. “This is nothing less than an attack on our Republican form of government.”

Paul Jacob and Sen. Randy Brogdon both have said, What is really happening here is a conspiracy to violate “under color of law” the constitutional right to petition for redress of grievances in Oklahoma.


www.freepauljacob.com